首页> 外文OA文献 >Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support.
【2h】

Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support.

机译:选举和接受在线支持:使用计算机辅助内容分析来检查在线社会支持的动态。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Although many people with serious diseases participate in online support communities, little research has investigated how participants elicit and provide social support on these sites.OBJECTIVE: The first goal was to propose and test a model of the dynamic process through which participants in online support communities elicit and provide emotional and informational support. The second was to demonstrate the value of computer coding of conversational data using machine learning techniques (1) by replicating results derived from human-coded data about how people elicit support and (2) by answering questions that are intractable with small samples of human-coded data, namely how exposure to different types of social support predicts continued participation in online support communities. The third was to provide a detailed description of these machine learning techniques to enable other researchers to perform large-scale data analysis in these communities.METHODS: Communication among approximately 90,000 registered users of an online cancer support community was analyzed. The corpus comprised 1,562,459 messages organized into 68,158 discussion threads. Amazon Mechanical Turk workers coded (1) 1000 thread-starting messages on 5 attributes (positive and negative emotional self-disclosure, positive and negative informational self-disclosure, questions) and (2) 1000 replies on emotional and informational support. Their judgments were used to train machine learning models that automatically estimated the amount of these 7 attributes in the messages. Across attributes, the average Pearson correlation between human-based judgments and computer-based judgments was .65.RESULTS: Part 1 used human-coded data to investigate relationships between (1) 4 kinds of self-disclosure and question asking in thread-starting posts and (2) the amount of emotional and informational support in the first reply. Self-disclosure about negative emotions (beta=.24, PCONCLUSIONS: Self-disclosure is effective in eliciting emotional support, whereas question asking is effective in eliciting informational support. Moreover, perceptions that people desire particular kinds of support influence the support they receive. Finally, the type of support people receive affects the likelihood of their staying in or leaving the group. These results demonstrate the utility of machine learning methods for investigating the dynamics of social support exchange in online support communities.
机译:背景:尽管许多重症患者参加了在线支持社区,但很少有研究调查参与者如何在这些站点上引发和提供社会支持。目的:第一个目标是提出并测试在线参与者通过动态过程建立的模型支持社区引起并提供情感和信息支持。其次是通过机器学习技术来证明对话数据的计算机编码的价值(1)通过复制从人类编码的数据中得出的有关人们如何获得支持的结果,以及(2)回答一些小样本人类难以解决的问题,编码数据,即接触不同类型的社会支持的方式如何预测在线支持社区的持续参与。第三是对这些机器学习技术的详细描述,以使其他研究人员能够在这些社区中进行大规模数据分析。方法:分析了在线癌症支持社区的大约90,000注册用户之间的交流。语料库包含1,562,459条消息,整理成68,158条讨论线程。 Amazon Mechanical Turk工人对(1)1000条关于5个属性(积极和消极的情感自我披露,积极和消极的信息自我披露,问题)的线程启动消息进行了编码,并且(2)1000条关于情感和信息支持的回复。他们的判断被用于训练机器学习模型,该模型自动估计消息中这7个属性的数量。在所有属性中,基于人的判断与基于计算机的判断之间的平均Pearson相关性为0.65。结果:第1部分使用人编码的数据调查了(1)4种自我披露与线程启动时提问之间的关系。帖子,以及(2)在第一个回复中提供的情感和信息支持。关于负面情绪的自我披露(β= .24,结论:自我披露可以有效地获得情感支持,而提问可以有效地获得信息支持。此外,人们渴望获得特定支持的感知会影响他们获得的支持。最后,人们获得支持的类型会影响他们留在或离开小组的可能性,这些结果证明了机器学习方法可用于调查在线支持社区中社会支持交流的动态。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号